<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clickfire Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.clickfire.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.clickfire.com</link>
	<description>where I share my Internet experiences, make friends and have fun.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Exact Match Domain Absurdity</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/exact-match-domain/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/exact-match-domain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exact Match]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google SERPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memorial Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you vacationing this spring? Lots of folks take a trip over Memorial Day weekend, but I can't remember the exact date.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you vacationing this spring? Lots of folks take a trip over Memorial Day weekend, which is coming up soon. I&#8217;m planning to enjoy some time off for the holiday while I reflect on the sacrifice of fallen U.S. soldiers. But&#8230; I can&#8217;t remember the exact date. It&#8217;s usually on a Monday, I recall. Oh wait, I&#8217;ll do a quick Google search for: &#8220;memorial day 2011.&#8221;</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-804 alignnone" style="margin: 10px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Exact Match Search for Memorial Day 2011" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/exact-match-memorial-day.png" alt="Exact Match Search for Memorial Day 2011" width="525" height="382" /></p>
<p>I just thought it was kind of funny that someone reserved the .org domain for the exact keyword phrase I was looking for, down to the very year of 2011. It will be interesting to see how well the exact match domain SEO tactic works next year at this time. Have a great Memorial Day!</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-805 alignnone" style="margin: 10px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Exact Match Search Screen Cap" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/exact-match-memorial-day-screen.png" alt="Exact Match Search Screen Cap" width="525" height="471" /></p>
<p><!-- Has SEO come to this? If you spend very much time doing Google searches, you know that this is done frequently because Google ranks domains high that contain the exact keywords you are looking in a search query. Is this wrong? Sometimes the resulting page is very useful. Other times, not. Rumors are that Google will adjust their search algorithm to put less weight on exact match domains in these cases. This means that Google is going to have to figure out if a site is truly relevent to the query even if the query matches.</p>
<p>Why do we need Google if you can just type in the domain name in the browser address field?</p>
<p>I wonder what revenue this ultra targetted landing page is making. One thing I can predict with certainty: on May 31st the revenue drops. --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/exact-match-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Spin Fail</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/article-spin-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/article-spin-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article Spinning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Fail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Humans rock! You know sometimes it's funny to see how article spinning software just totallly misses the point. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-801" style="margin: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Article Spin Fail" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/article-spin-fail.png" alt="Article Spin Fail: I think you meant Sex and the City" width="525" height="90" /></p>
<p>Have you ever found yourself reading an article and realized that a word or two just seemed insanely out of place? And that if another more obvious word were substituted, the sentence would make perfect sense? Why didn&#8217;t the author use the correct wording? You may have been the victim of an article spin fail:</p>
<blockquote><p>a SEO tactic whereby numerous unique versions of an original article are automatically generated by searching and replacing keywords and phrases, but that does not make sense to the human eye.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you&#8217;re like me, you probably don&#8217;t read as much as you&#8217;d like. Call me prejudiced, but when I read, I like to read works that are written by humans. I won&#8217;t call out the source, but I stumbled the above phrase while strolling through a neighbor&#8217;s <a href="http://www.clickfire.com/google-content-farms-ugc/">content farm</a>. Do you think the above was written by a human? Someone or something totally missed the point.</p>
<p>Notice the first sentence in the bullet point. Note the capitalization. How should the sentence have read?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/article-spin-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Instant Suggests Site Models When Using Site Operator</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/site-models/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/site-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Operator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All a man wants to do is use the site operator in Google, but noooo&#8230;  If you type &#8220;site:&#8221; in the search field, before you get a chance to type in the domain, Google Instant suggests the most popular search results and look what you get, a bunch of 15 year old girls taking pictures of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All a man wants to do is use the site operator in Google, but noooo&#8230;  If you type &#8220;site:&#8221; in the search field, before you get a chance to type in the domain, Google Instant suggests the most popular search results and look what you get, a bunch of 15 year old girls taking pictures of themselves. I didn&#8217;t even know what a &#8221;site model&#8221; was. Take my word, I&#8217;ve been educated by Google.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-794" style="margin: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Google Instant: Site Models and Site Operators" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/google-instant-fail-success.jpg" alt="Google Instant: Site Models and Site Operators" width="516" height="908" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/site-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Reasons CharlieSheen.com is not Winning</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/charlie-sheen/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/charlie-sheen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Winning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen would not have made it as a domainer as this sad case illustrates.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the Charlie Sheen eruptions in the news of late, I thought I&#8217;d look at the state of the most valuable rendition of Charlie&#8217;s name in Internet terms: <strong>CharlieSheen.com. </strong>It turned out to be a far gnarlier situation than imagined. CharlieSheen.com <em>is</em> on drugs. Here are five reasons why the domain in its current state, is far from winning:</p>
<h2>1. CharlieSheen.com is Down</h2>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-784" style="margin: 5px 10px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Charlie Sheen .com Not Found" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/charlie-sheen-com2.png" alt="Charlie Sheen .com Not Found" width="409" height="229" /><br />
Celebrity status aside, one of the most important aspects of a winning website starts with, well, being able to view it. CharlieSheen.com displays the  default &#8221;404 page not found&#8221; page in any browser that requests the page. 404 is the http status code that occurs when a website is aka losing, aka not winning. 100% down time means no train wreck to watch. Listen and hear it crying out for web hosting. <span id="more-783"></span></p>
<h2>2. Charlie Sheen doesn&#8217;t own CharlieSheen.com</h2>
<p><a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/charliesheen.com"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-792" style="margin: 8px 10px; border: black 1px solid;" title="CharlieSheen.com Whois Record" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/charlie-sheen-whois.png" alt="CharlieSheen.com Whois Record" width="345" height="462" /></a></p>
<p>According to the current <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/charliesheen.com">whois</a> record, a Hot Rods company in Canada owns Charlie Sheen&#8217;s namesake .com. March 19, 1997 was a good day for the owner of CharlieSheen.com, but not for Sheen. Charlie starred in no less than <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000221/">five</a> films that year. There probably wasn&#8217;t a lot of time for dealing with Network Solutions, the one and only domain registrar at the time. Now, even CharlieSheen.info is taken. But, why hasn&#8217;t Sheen bought CharlieSheen.com instead of spending on some of the other things we hear about? CharlieSheen.com could be a winning domain if only it were in Sheen&#8217;s hands.</p>
<h2>3. Not Indexed by Google</h2>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-786" style="margin: 5px 10px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Charlie Sheen .com Not Winning with Pages Indexed in Google" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/charlie-sheen-com.png" alt="Charlie Sheen's Ideal Domain: Pages Indexed" width="525" height="230" /></p>
<p>How much free organic search traffic do you think Google would send Charlie Sheen&#8217;s site if it had even one page indexed? How many natural backlinks would Sheen&#8217;s domain receive? How many of the 368,000 Googlers in the image below who typed &#8220;Charlie Sheen&#8221; into the search field would click through to the exact match .com domain? Getting indexed would be a quick and easy win for this celebrity, no doubt.</p>
<h2>4. No Content</h2>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-797" style="margin: 8px 10px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Charlie Sheen Content :)" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/charlie-sheen-content.png" alt="Charlie Sheen Content :)" width="400" height="299" /></p>
<p>Perhaps worse than a content farm and certainly more tragic is the conspicuous absence of web content on CharlieSheen.com. Whatever your opinion about Charlie Sheen, everyone agrees that he is a human viral content generating machine. Imagine the content that could fill the pages of a CharlieSheen.com curated by the Sheen.</p>
<h2>5. Not Monetized</h2>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-795" style="margin: 8px 10px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Charlie Sheen Keywords" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/charlie-sheen-keywords.png" alt="Charlie Sheen Keywords" width="407" height="534" /></p>
<p>The Google AdWords Keyword <a href="https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000">Tool</a> suggests some words and their corresponding exact match traffic that CharlieSheen.com could potentially receive. How many of those 368,000 Googlers who typed &#8220;Charlie Sheen&#8221; into the search field would click through to the exact match .com domain? Would fans buy Charlie Sheen T-Shirts and DVDs? Would the consume Charlie Sheen news from the horses mouth?</p>
<p>And what about monetizing traffic from social media? A celebrity with 3 million Twitter followers and over half a million Facebook likes should be able to seriously bring it.</p>
<p>Let it be known that I am not a fan of Charlie Sheen&#8217;s domain strategy. But, does he really need CharlieSheen.com? There may come a point where celebrity brands can transcend the need for exact match domains that trolls like us to fawn over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/charlie-sheen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AdSense Fail: SEO Malpractice and Guaranteed SEO</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/adsense-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/adsense-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdSense Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can all get along but not on the same AdSense ad. Behold the irony of this ad which I observed on a popular SEO website.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-631" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="SEO Malpractice with Guaranteed Rankings" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/seo-malpractice.jpg" alt="SEO Malpractice Ad Juxtaposed with Guaranteed Rankings" width="479" height="66" /></p>
<p>Hey SEO&#8217;s, what&#8217;s wrong with this Google AdSense advertisement? Don&#8217;t you love the way that two businesses have to co-exist on the same Google AdSense ad? One way to avoid SEO malpractice is to restrain yourself from the practice of <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35291">guaranteed</a> SEO:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>No one can guarantee a #1 ranking on Google</strong>.</p>
<p>Beware of SEOs that claim to guarantee rankings, allege a &#8220;special relationship&#8221; with Google, or advertise a &#8220;priority submit&#8221; to Google.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps the above quote from the Google Search Engine Optimization Guidelines should read <em>No one can guarantee a #1 ranking on Google except a Google advertiser</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/adsense-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buying Call of Duty Black Ops</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/call-of-duty-black-ops/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/call-of-duty-black-ops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PC Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call Of Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call of Duty Black Ops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call of Duty Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kobe Bryant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Warfare 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiplayer gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmqwestcomtopic1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m heading out to buy my copy of Call of Duty Black Ops and have a few thoughts before go. Multiplayer online games have been part of my life since the mid-1990&#8242;s. It was lonely in those days, firing up the old 28k modem and a bit of hope to connect with friends. I remember [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-768 alignnone" title="Kobe Bryant in the Call of Duty: Black Ops TV Commercial" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/call-of-duty-kobe.jpg" alt="Kobe Bryant in the Call of Duty: Black Ops TV Commercial" width="525" height="398" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m heading out to buy my copy of <a href="http://www.callofduty.com">Call of Duty Black Ops</a> and have a few thoughts before go. Multiplayer online games have been part of my life since the mid-1990&#8242;s. It was lonely in those days, firing up the old 28k modem and a bit of hope to connect with friends. I remember wanting to play certain games like flight sims and there just not being enough opponents around. The graphics were quite bad so I had to use the imagination to sufficiently suspend reality. Yes, I remember literally <a href="http://www.clickfire.com/a-voodoo-odyssey/">stalking the truck that delivered some of the 3DFX Voodoo 2 graphics cards</a> to my neighborhood. If you were a gamer, you were a geek in those days. <span id="more-767"></span></p>
<p>I find myself going out to make a purchase of around $60 for a game I have not tried the beta for and which I feel confident I don&#8217;t need to try.  I know for certain that Call of Duty: Black Ops will be fun not just because the last title proved loads of fun, Modern Warfare 2, but because of the unprecedented consumer demand. For this game to fail, it would be like a dud Spielberg film or a bitter Starbucks latte. Activision could charge $120 per copy and double their revenue, if they wanted.</p>
<p>Another thing. I will probably finish the single player version of the game in days and move on to the longer lasting, competitive arena of multiplayer, which I&#8217;ll play for at least a year. I&#8217;ll get my money&#8217;s worth and it might even keep my out of trouble in the real world. Today the online aspect of games has become the dominant mode over single player because <a href="http://blog.clickfire.com/social-media-and-pc-online-games-with-steam/">gaming is now solidly social</a>. </p>
<p>This stuff is seriously main stream now. It&#8217;s funny. Everytime I wear the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 T-shirt my wife gave me for Christmas last year, people everywhere start coming up to me with that glimmer in their eye saying</p>
<blockquote><p>Great game, man.</p></blockquote>
<p>To which I agree and then inevitably the question of what platform do you play on comes up, to which I reply &#8220;PC&#8221; and they usually reply Playstation or Xbox. But, that brings me to another point. It doesn&#8217;t matter what platform you play on anymore. It&#8217;s the same game. You know the guy has experienced the thrill of killstreaks and the undying agony of stolen care packages. It&#8217;s a high five, bonding type moment. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s no longer lonely being an online gamer. It&#8217;s no longer slow. No longer pixelated. And just as I&#8217;m writing this, I look at Kobe Bryant in the Activision Call of Duty: Black Ops commercial and realize that it&#8217;s no longer considered geeky to spend many hours in front of a screen without eating or sleeping. The <a href="http://www.clickfire.com/gaming-in-the-future/">future</a> of online gaming looks even better than it did before.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="525" height="320" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Pblj3JHF-Jo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="525" height="320" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Pblj3JHF-Jo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object><br />
<small>Call of Duty: Black Ops TV Commercial &#8220;There&#8217;s a Soldier in All of Us&#8221;</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/call-of-duty-black-ops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Ads During the Election</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/google-election-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/google-election-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Election Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google shy away from brand damage during the political season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-766 alignnone" title="Google Ads During the Political Season" src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/adsense-political.png" alt="Google Ads During the election" width="525" height="737" /> <span id="more-763"></span></p>
<p>Did you notice the ads during this political season? The ad pictured above depicting Democrat incumbant senator Barbara Boxer bull running in Spain is sponsored by her Republican opponent Carly Fiorina. If you hold your mouse over the subtle &#8220;i&#8221; you will see that the ad is also <em>sponsored</em> by Google. I like the ad, but I have never seen Google show any hint of wanting to hide the &#8220;Ads by Google&#8221; message that prevents the blurring of website content with advertising. Perhaps Google doesn&#8217;t mind a little confusion within political ads that range from tame (like this one), to offensive, (more common). After all, these ads don&#8217;t involve ecommerce, just the future of the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/google-election-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Link Building, Web Designer Style</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/link-building-web-designer/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/link-building-web-designer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Designer Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Designers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Link building for web designers can be easy... and some might say sleazy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-765 alignnone" style="margin: 5px; border: black 10px solid;" title="Web Design SEO Fail:Can we put a link to our site to the footer of your site (designed by our company name)? If no – we require additional payment of 20% of total price." src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/web-design-seo-fail.png" alt="Web Design SEO Fail: Can we put a link to our site to the footer of your site (designed by our company name)? If no – we require additional payment of 20% of total price." width="525" height="131" /></p>
<p><strong>So this is how web designers get all those of links</strong>. This might work for most folks, but not me. Recently I asked for an estimate from several web design firms for a new project. One of the web design firms replied with a rather lengthy questionairre for to fill out and return. When I saw number 5, I stopped cold, yelled loudly, then closed the questionairre. One thing I am not going to do is pay a web designer 20% of the project price to keep his link off of my site. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/link-building-web-designer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>14 Things I Dig about Digg 4</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/digg4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/digg4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg revolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you think there was nothing to like about the new Digg, Digg4? Think again :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could you, my fellow and former diggers, think there was so little to love about the latest version of the social media news site, Digg 4? There is plenty. Not seeing the ground for the dirt? I&#8217;m going to open your eyes, then and <em>call a shovel a shovel</em>. What&#8217;s there to love about Digg 4?<span id="more-759"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>
<h2>Digg 4 is Faster</h2>
<p>Not just because it is built on the same <a href="http://cassandra.apache.org/">database</a> modelling as Facebook, Twitter and Reddit, but because Digg 4 is all about speed and efficiency. The cleverly engineered minimalist user interface, keep-it-simple-stupid functionality, and stripped down features mean faster load times and less drag on server resources. Who needs burdensome social media gimmicks anyway?</li>
<li>
<h2>No more &#8220;Digg Effect&#8221;</h2>
<p>Does your website get traffic from Digg, so much that it crashes your server? The &#8220;Digg effect&#8221; became a badge of honor to some bloggers, but most did not cherish picking up the pieces after making the Digg front page. It turns out that the Digg 4 effect is not the same as the Digg effect. With Digg 4&#8242;s new traffic mitigating architecture, you don&#8217;t have to worry about large numbers of Digg visitors rushing to your site. This means you can cut your site operating budget. Purchase cheap web hosting and still sleep well at night. You don&#8217;t need VPS hosting, a dedicated server or trendy cloud hosting. You can even remove those cache plugins from your WordPress installation.</li>
<li>
<h2>More Friends</h2>
<p>No more policing your submissions to see if your digg friends are <em>really</em> your friends. It doesn&#8217;t matter. Everyone is your friend on Digg 4. Add everyone as friends. Do it now!</li>
<li>
<h2>Digg 4 is Honest</h2>
<p>What if there was actually something that wasn&#8217;t Bush&#8217;s fault? Would anyone have the courage to say so? From <a href="http://thedudeoforkut.blogspot.com/2010/10/kevin-rose-and-digg-can-listen-if-you.html">BP ads</a> to &#8220;there is a x% chance that this is programmer Doe&#8217;s fault&#8221; errors, Digg 4 has some of the most honest messaging in all of social media. I challenge anyone to show me a site with more unabashed, straightforward admissions.</li>
<li>
<h2>Freedom from Burynoia</h2>
<p>Don&#8217;t you hate it when you submit a great story that 99% of Digg users think sucks only to have your dream narrative tossed six feet underground in the same hole with Republican microsoft-loving spammers? Not in Digg 4. There are no <a href="http://blog.clickfire.com/digg-funny-thing/">bury brigades</a> or <a href="http://blog.clickfire.com/digg-patriots/">left-wing smear campaigns</a>.</li>
<li>
<h2>Arrive Home Safely</h2>
<p>Are your Digg relationships so important that you scratch your friends&#8217; backs via the Digg mobile app in traffic? Worry no more. The digg iPhone app doesn&#8217;t work (oops, now it seems to wo&#8211;)</li>
<li>
<h2>No More Lost Password Worries</h2>
<p>Misplace your Digg 4 password? No problem. Take a deep breath. Wait it out. No need to panic. Digg 4 will be there exactly as it was before you got locked out.</li>
<li>
<h2>Liberation from Powerusers</h2>
<p>Do you dislike with a passion how the poweruser elites take advantage of you by submitting stories from your favorite site BEFORE you? Never worry about rushing out to find good sources of news to submit before <a href="http://blog.clickfire.com/diggs-mrbabyman-hits-10000th-submission/">MrBabyMan</a> gets his hands on your story and takes credit for it. With Digg 4, you don&#8217;t even have to worry about submitting. Just sit back in your chair, grab some popcorn and coke and watch the autosubmissions.</li>
<li>
<h2>Better RSS</h2>
<p>Some people like living on the edge. Does the ability to manage your RSS feeds from your favorite sites give you a thrill that words cannot describe? Make you feel young again? You&#8217;re in luck because Digg 4 does an excellent job with displaying near real-time data from sites that YOU choose. You&#8217;ll never be forced to view the submissions of others with Digg 4.</li>
<li>
<h2>Reduced Bannings</h2>
<p>Violate the Digg terms of service? Not violate the Digg terms of service? Yes, I know you&#8217;ve worried about being banned either way. Digg 4 makes getting banned less likely.</li>
<li>
<h2>Programmers Can Move On</h2>
<p>You know that tool based on the Digg API that you put hundreds of hours of your time into building? It and the Digg API are &#8220;deprecated.&#8221;</li>
<li>
<h2>Popularity Contests Ended</h2>
<p>You know you want to be the most popular user on Digg, right? You want the celebrity status. Admit it. It&#8217;s driving you crazy and you&#8217;re making bad submissions as a result. You can&#8217;t think clearly. Your significant other is asking you why you are staring at your Digg statistics all day long. With Digg 4, you won&#8217;t develop OCD over whether or not the story you worked hard to find and submit went popular. A story is a story after all, right? And, by the same token, a submitter is a submitter, is he not? Be confident that by design, all submitters are equal in the perfect social world of Digg 4.</li>
<li>
<h2>No Training Required</h2>
<p>Confused about how to use the new Digg? Me too. I usually just sit there and stare for a while, then try and find an old friend or a story I like. Digg something. Feel confused. Leave. Come back. Rinse. Repeat. Some are saying that <a href="http://www.techi.com/2010/10/7-changes-digg-needs-to-make-to-stop-failing/">training</a> would help. But why complicate things? Fortunately, there is absolutely no training required or even available to imply that you do anything you may not want to do. Digg 4 is about freedom.</li>
<li>
<h2>Digg 4 Has a Sense of Humor</h2>
<p>Tired of seeing the common attempts at 404 error pages that scrub sites offer? Can&#8217;t access a digg.com page? The Digg 4 errors will leave you rolling in the dirt laughing.</li>
</ol>
<p>You can see that the new shovel-ready Digg 4 relieves the daily stress that comes from interacting in social media. Digg 4 provides you more time to spend with people in the real world whether you want to or not. Digg 4 gives you more time for working, playing, sleeping or whatever <em>you</em> want to do. In short, Digg 4 makes your life more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/digg4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miss Me Yet?</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickfire.com/miss-me-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clickfire.com/miss-me-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bury Brigade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bury Button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg Bury Brigade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg Bury Button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg Picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg revolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickfire.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you miss the Digg Bury Button? Be honest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-751" title="Do you miss the Digg Bury Button? Be honest." src="http://blog.clickfire.com/wp-content/uploads/miss-me-yet.jpg" alt="Miss Me Yet?" width="467" height="353" /></p>
<p>Follow <a href="http://twitter.com/TheBuryButton">@TheBuryButton</a> on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clickfire.com/miss-me-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

