2000+ Validation Errors
I found this when checking a random page with the W3C Validation service tool. Is this a case of a really bad web designer with no budget? Nope. The page belongs to a fortune 500 company. I’ll spare them the embarassment and keep them nameless.
“This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!” — What an understandment!
Related Blog Posts
Blog post August 7th, 2008 by emory @ clickfire in Web Design 4 Comments »
September 23rd, 2008 at 6:39 am
This is awesome. Looks like kid doing his first web from lame template.
But wait, even kid don’t messd so many things.
November 29th, 2008 at 5:16 pm
If you look at a lot of the major websites, not many validate properly. Not because of poor or sloppy programming practices (in general) but due to the fact a lot of their users / customers use old browsers and need hacks and old code to display the site properly.
December 10th, 2008 at 5:51 am
W3C validation is very important to each and every website. If websites have warnings, errors search engine spiders reduce crawled ratio. XHTML , CSS validation will help to google natural sitemaps.
October 18th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
I agree that W3C validation is very very important. It def helps in your site’s SEO and 2000+ error is a joke.